Legal Opinion
Chudnov v. Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 6, 1931PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, • J.
On April 12th, 1929, the town of Bloomfield, under and pursuant to Chapter 242 of the Public Acts of 1925 (now Chapter 29 of the General Statutes), adopted comprehensive zoning regulations, dividing the town into districts, one, in which the appellant’s property is located, being designated as “C Residence Zone.” The regulations contain a provision (Section II) that “In a residence zone, subject to the provisions of Section VI [which allows the continuance of existing nonconforming uses and buildings devoted thereto and certain changes or extensions], no building or premises shall…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Holley v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Deflumeri v. SunderlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Lathrop v. Town of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Spector Motor Service, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.