Legal Opinion

Grady v. Katz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1938PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Pursuant to a special act of the General Assembly, No. 490, Special Laws of 1925, the city of New Haven on December 17th, 1926, adopted an ordinance, since amended, dividing the city into zones and regulating the use, height and bulk of buildings and the areas of lots. The defendant board has been constituted under •§ 6 of the special act and consists of five members named in the writ. Mrs. Michael Mursko is the owner of 85 Truman Street, New Haven, consisting of a lot with a residence and a garage thereon. The plaintiffs own 87-89 Truman Street, the adjoining property, a lot with house…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  2. Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  3. Perdue v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  4. Skarzynski v. Liquor Control CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Levine v. Zoning Board of Appeals of MeridenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  2. Brandon v. Board of Commissioners of MontclairSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  3. Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  5. Conley v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API