American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Chicago-Los Angeles Building Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
HAZLETT, J., pro tem.
-This was an action on an alleged account stated in the sum of $655.67. The answer denied that defendant, the appellant herein, became to plaintiff on an account stated or otherwise in said or any sum" or that any sum was owing or unpaid from defendant to plaintiff. No other issue was presented by the pleadings.
A stipulation of facts was made by the parties and was considered by the lower court, in which stipulation the parties agreed, among other things, that plaintiff “had demanded of the defendant the sum of $655.67, claiming the same was due upon a policy ... of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auzerais v. NagleeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Ah Tong v. Earle Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- Merchs.' Nat'l Bank of San Francisco v. CarmichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Outwaters v. BrownleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tolmie v. San Diego Fruit and Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Petrosino v. WakefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- MacLaren v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Stark v. McAllisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944