Legal Opinion

Stark v. McAllister

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1944No. Civ. 12646PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.—

This appeal is taken on the judgment roll from a judgment in favor of defendant. From the findings the following facts appear: On July 17, 1942, appellant filed a creditor’s claim against the estate of Byron W. Haines, deceased, as assignee of one Alfred C. Skaife “on stated account for services rendered $1,800.00.” On or about July 20, 1942, respondent, as executrix of said estate, rejected this claim and notice of such rejection was given in writing to appellant on July 22, 1942. No action was brought on this claim within three months as required by section 714, Probate…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Lundberg v. KatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. United States Gypsum Co. v. ShafferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Syler v. KatzerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Barnett v. Hitching Post Lodge, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API