MacLaren v. Gilbert
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
The judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff covers the amount due on two promissory notes, which were set out in the first two counts of the complaint. About these items there is no controversy. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment because the court refused to allow the demand contained in the third count of the complaint, the amount thereof being $1543.09.
The action was commenced on September 8, 1927. Count three of the complaint alleged that within four years last past the defendant became indebted to the plaintiff in said sum upon an account for certain goods, wares and merchandise sold…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Chicago-Los Angeles Building Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Ough v. Ansonia Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- Foothill Ditch Co. v. Wallace Ranch Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1938
- Fogarty v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943