Legal Opinion

Petrosino v. Wakefield

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1934No. Civ. No. 1226PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

In 1921 Gerardo Sica bought a vineyard in Fresno County, consisting of 160 acres, and at the same time engaged in the business of shipping grapes from California to eastern markets, having packing-houses in several cities in this state. He resided at all times in the state of New Jersey although, up to the time of his death on April 7, 1930, he spent a short period during each year in California in connection with this business. During practically all of this time the plaintiff was employed by Sica in a supervisory capacity on this ranch and in connection with the shipping of grapes to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bennett v. PotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Coffee v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Outwaters v. BrownleeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. Craig v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Chicago-Los Angeles Building Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tolmie v. San Diego Fruit and Produce Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Stark v. McAllisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Hill v. Security First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Metropolitan Water District v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API