Ah Tong v. Earle Fruit Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. M. K. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Britt, C.
Plaintiff, a Chinese, early in August, 1893, delivered a quantity of pears to defendant, a corporation, to be sold upon commission; he alleged in his complaint that defendant, as part of its contract with him, guaranteed to him a net return of fifteen dollars per ton for the pears; that he delivered 184,190 pounds of the fruit to defendant, and was entitled to receive therefor at the rate guaranteed the sum of $1006.44; that defendant paid only the sum of $550, leaving a balance due of $456.44, for which he sues. Defendant denied the guaranty, and set up as a counterclaim that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burns v. Sennett & MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Goodwyn v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- Williams v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Brumley v. FlintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Frey v. LowdenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Sime v. MaloufCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People v. SinghCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- De Franco v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1955
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.