Legal Opinion
Herrlein v. Tocchini
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 1933No. Docket No. 8576PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODWARD, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by two of the defendants, Fred A. Tocchini and TI. J. Tocchini, from a coercive declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiffs.
The factual background of the controversy, being somewhat involved and having unusual ramifications, will be set forth chronologically and at length: On or about May 15, 1928, the appellants, Fred A. Tocchini and H. J. Tocchini, the former being the more active in the transaction, gave a telephone order to Lilienthal, Bremer & Company, brokers, for a “buyer 60” contract covering 200 shares of Bancitaly stock. Prior to said date…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Hess v. Country Club ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
- Duff v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tolle v. StruveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. WillrichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Zimmer v. GorelnikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.