Legal Opinion

Schaefer v. First National Bank

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1938No. 27093PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

Many questions were rais'ed on the pleadings, and rulings thereon were assigned as error. When a decision is made by the trial court on the evidence, and judgment entered accordingly, errors previously committed in passing upon demurrers' to pleadings are unavailing unless prejudicial. Putnam v. Board of Commrs. of Paulding County, 102 Ohio St., 45, 130 N. E., 165; Yocum, Admr., v. Allen, 58 Ohio St., 280, 50 N. E., 909; Dayton Ins. Co. v. Kelley, 24 Ohio St., 345, 15 Am. Rep., 612.

In the instant case the rulings on the sufficiency of the pleadings were not prejudicial to the defendant, The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Holly Sugar Corp. v. FritzlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Faulkner v. KeeneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Masters v. BeamerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Herrlein v. TocchiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Rouse v. BolenArizona Supreme Court · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. General Accident Insurance v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Cobb v. HarringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Karches v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Driscoll v. Austintown AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Gates Mills Investment Co. v. Village of Pepper PikeOhio Court of Appeals · 1978

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API