Legal Opinion

Standard Box Co. v. Mutual Biscuit Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1909No. Civ. No. 588PublishedCited by 38 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. George A. Sturtevant, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to defendant by plaintiff. The cause was tried by a jury and plaintiff had the verdict for $1,444.83, the amount claimed in the complaint. Defendant appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.

It appeared that defendant had been purchasing certain boxes, cases and trays from plaintiff for defendant’s use in its business, during the year 1905, under a written agreement dated July 25, 1905. While this contract was in force, to wit, September 1, 1905, plaintiff addressed the following letter to defendant (Defendant’s…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Hackley v. HeadleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Chicago & Great Eastern Railway Co. v. DaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  3. Robertson v. Frank Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
  4. Brumagim v. TillinghastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Martin v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1881

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Masterson v. SineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Rich & Whillock, Inc. v. Ashton Development, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Baldwin-Lima-Hamilton Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Buffalo Arms, Inc. v. Remler Co.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Calpetro Producers Syndicate v. Chas M. Woods Co.California Supreme Court · 1929

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API