Mitau v. Roddan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. H. Carlin, Hiram Johnson, and Charles W. Slack, for Defendants, Appellants and Respondents. Albert M. Johnson, and Devlin & Devlin, for Plaintiffs, Respondents and Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
Three appeals are taken in these cases, all presented upon one bill of exceptions, and will be disposed of together. The plaintiffs in one ease are H. Mitau, E. A. Casey, and P. C. Drescher; in the other P. C. Drescher is the sole plaintiff. The defendants and appellants in both cases are J. W. and W. B. Roddan and Louis A. and E. C. Horst.
The first action was brought by Mitau and Casey, as trustees in a deed of trust, and P. C. Drescher, against the Roddans and Horsts. The Horsts were made defendants, for the reason that they had, subsequent to the execution of the deed of trust, bought the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- O'Connor v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Matter of Estate of StrautNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Keith v. Electrical Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Universal Sales Corp. v. California Press Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.