Legal Opinion
Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 28, 2010No. SC 18412PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
EVELEIGH, J.
The sole issue in this certified appeal 1 is whether the failure to file an appeal from the decision of a workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) within the twenty day limit set forth in General Statutes § 31-301 (a) 2 deprives the compensation review board (board) of subject matter jurisdiction over that appeal. 3 Specifically, we must determine whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that the board improperly had dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction the appeal of the second injury fund (fund) 4 from a decision of the commissioner concluding…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lynn v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. CruzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Commissioner of Mental Health & Addiction Services v. SaeediConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Pagan v. Carey Wiping Materials Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Gould v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- JP Morgan Chase Bank v. GIANOPOULOSConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.