Legal Opinion

Hatt v. Burlington Coat Factory

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 22, 2003No. SC 16737PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

This appeal presents the issues of whether the workers’ compensation review board (board) improperly: (1) concluded that General Statutes § 31-3491 abrogated common-law apportionment in *281workers’ compensation cases and that § 31-349 (d), *282which closed the second injury fund to new claims, renders the insurer at the time of the claimant’s second injury solely liable for those disability claims; (2) concluded that General Statutes (Rev. to 1999) § 31-299b2 permits apportionment only in cases of repetitive *283trauma or occupational disease and, therefore, does not provide a basis…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Gaudio v. Griffin Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Pacelli Bros. Transportation, Inc. v. PacelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Davis v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. Kron v. ThelenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. State v. LuttersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Wasko v. ManellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API