Legal Opinion

Dechio v. Raymark Industries, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 28, 2010No. SC 18413PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVELEIGH, J.

The sole issue in this certified appeal is whether, in cases wherein the defendant, the second injury fund (fund), has participated in proceedings before the workers’ compensation commission (com mission), the twenty day appeal period provided by General Statutes § 31-301 (a) 1 for the fund to challenge an adverse ruling of a workers’ compensation commissioner (commissioner) by appealing to the compensation review board (board), does not commence until the commissioner’s issuance of a supplemental order directing the fund to pay benefits pursuant to General Statutes §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hall v. Gilbert & Bennett Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. Hummel v. Marten Transports, Ltd.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Paranteau v. DeVitaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  5. Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. O. & G. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. Stec v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
  4. Maio v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  5. Reid v. SpeerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API