Legal Opinion
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. GIANOPOULOS
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 30, 2011No. AC 32681PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The self-represented defendant Sophie Gianopoulos appeals from the judgment of strict foreclosure, as opened and modified, rendered in favor of the plaintiff, JP Morgan Chase Bank, successor trustee in interest to Bank One, National Association. She claims that during a hearing on the plaintiffs motion to open the judgment for the purpose of setting new law days, when attorney Stuart Ratner identified himself as representing “the defendant,” the court abused its discretion by failing to inquire whether Ratner represented her interests as well as those of Dean A.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Appliances, Inc. v. YostSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Barclays Bank of New York v. IvlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lawrence v. CordsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Ellen S. v. Katlyn F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Bromfield v. PatrickDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022
- Handsome, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015