Legal Opinion
Gould v. City of Stamford
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 2, 2019No. SC20004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
The issue that we must resolve in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Peter Gould, the sole member of a single-member limited liability company, Intervale Group, LLC (Intervale), qualifies as Intervale's employee for purposes of the Workers' Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., and is therefore eligible for concurrent compensation benefits from the defendant Second Injury Fund (fund) pursuant to General Statutes § 31-310. 1 The plaintiff was a part-time employee of the named defendant, the city of Stamford (city), 2 and, according to him, was concurrently employed by…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Sean P. McNamee v. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Docket No. 05-6151-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Echavarria v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Gottlieb v. Arrow Door Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- DeJesus v. R.P.M. Enterprises, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Cochran v. Dept. of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024
- Green v. RXO Last Mile, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Reserve Realty, LLC v. Windemere Reserve, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2023