Legal Opinion
Brydle v. Honigbaum
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 17, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2750PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
In Brydle v. Honigbaum, 49 F.(2d) 963, 18 C. C. P. A. 1517, an opinion was filed in this case and an order entered reversing the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office and remanding the matter for further action by said office. In considering the case in the first instance, it became quite apparent to the court that to award priority on the counts of the interference, as framed by the Patent Office, might result in an injustice to the parties, for reasons assigned in said opinion. The order made by the court was, so far as was within the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Townsend v. SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
- Miller v. HaymanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Janette v. FoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Harlan v. BregmanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Hedenskoog v. BackusCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Co. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- Colgate-Palmolive-Peet Co. v. Lever Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
- Euth v. OliverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Botnen v. DormanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Alvin L. Breen v. Walter A. Miller and Herbert G. StineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.