Legal Opinion

Botnen v. Dorman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided January 31, 1950No. Patent Appeals 5612PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding in which the Board of Interference Examiners of the United States Patent Office awarded priority to the party Dor-man, the award being based solely on alleged lack of diligence on the part of the party Botnen during a portion of the critical period.

The party Dorman also filed a paper purporting to be a notice of appeal in which there were set forth alleged errors in rulings of the board adverse to him as to his date of conception.

The subject matter involved relates to mufflers or silencers located in the exhaust pipe of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Janette v. FoldsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  2. Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Crane v. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  4. Akers v. PapstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  5. Draeger v. BradleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Houston v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of GaryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. Wolfgang B. Klemperer v. Nathan C. PriceCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959
  3. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  4. Application of Friedrich Gruschwitz and Albert FritzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. In re GruschwitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API