Legal Opinion
Miller v. Hayman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 12, 1931No. Patent Appeal 2534PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This appeal is taken from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office in an interference proceeding which affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee.
The invention involved is an interlocking seam for stovepipes. The issue is in two counts, which read as follows:
“1. A lock of the character described comprising a tubular structure doubled upon itself to form three thicknesses of material, two of which are on the axis side of the tube, the innermost thickness of the doubled portion having…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Consolidated Fruit-Jar Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robert C. Woofter v. Vernon E. CarlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
- In Re LongCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
- Jenks v. KnightCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Severson v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Bettis v. Patterson-Ballagh CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.