Legal Opinion

Harlan v. Bregman

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1930No. 2264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGaeeett, Judge

The two parties before us in this case claim to have invented a certain type of toy telephone. An interference was declared by the examiner April 10, 1925. A third party, Harold D. Allen, was involved in the interference so declared and in the subsequent proceedings in the-Patent Office, but no appeal was taken by him from the decision of the commissioner, so the contest before us is between Harlan and Bregman.

The counts in issue are as follows:

1. A toy telephone including a transmitter and receiver supporting base and an automatic calling device dial rotatably supported by the base, and a…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boucher Inventions, Ltd. v. Sola Electric Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1942
  2. Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  3. Nystrom v. MancusoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  4. Stresau v. IpsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  5. Brydle v. HonigbaumCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API