Legal Opinion
Euth v. Oliver
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 16, 1934No. Patent Appeal 3242PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.
An interference proceeding was instituted in the United States Patent Office between the application for a patent of the appellant, John E. Euth, filed February 6, 1930, and the pending application of the appellee, Walter E. Oliver, filed January 29, 1929, for a similar invention. The subject-matter of the interference was set out in five counts, which are as follows:
“1. In a mechanism for feeding perforated strips of material, a divided finger adapted to enter holes in the strips, and means to cause it to expand therein substantially in the line of feed, to position…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Fessenden v. WilsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
- Conover v. DownsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Starr Bros., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- McBride v. TeepleCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- In re SchlittlerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- Kear v. RoderCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Anderson v. WalchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.