Legal Opinion

Townsend v. Smith

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1929No. Patent Appeal 2179PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAHAM, Presiding Judge.

Harry P. Townsend, the appellant, presented his application to the Patent Office on January 13, 1922, praying that a patent might be issued to him on improvements in machines for cutting multiple threads on wood screws. On December 8, 1924, an interference proceeding was instituted and declared between his application and a patent issued to one Henry L. Smith, the appellee, No. 1,452,986, granted April 24, 1923, for a similar invention. The interference counts are seven in number, and are as follows:

“Count 1. An operating meehanism for a wood screw machine comprising a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bates v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Greenawalt v. DwightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1919
  3. Kennicott v. CapsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re Scott T. JolleyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
  3. Heard v. BurtonUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Ritter v. Rohm & Haas CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. George B. Spero v. Howard J. Ringold and George RosenkranzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API