Legal Opinion

Winn v. Ferguson

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 26, 1955No. Civ. 8542PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

This appeal is by defendants from a judgment entered upon the verdict of a jury awarding plaintiff $15,000 damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in an intersection collision while she was riding in an automobile driven by appellant Jessie Ferguson with the knowledge and consent of its owner, G. R. Ferguson.

There are two points to be passed upon herein. The first: Was respondent a passenger or a guest in the automobile? The second: If respondent was a passenger was appellant Jessie Ferguson, the driver, guilty of actionable negligence, or if respondent was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Haney v. TakakuraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Ray v. HanischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Reuther v. ViallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Ahlgren v. AhlgrenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API