Legal Opinion

Gillespie v. Rawlings

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1957No. L. A. No. 24611PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff, pursuant to jury verdict, in an action for personal injuries sustained when plaintiff was riding in an automobile operated by defendant. One count of the complaint alleges that plaintiff was a passenger for consideration, and one count alleges that defendant was guilty of wilful misconduct. De*361fendant urges that the evidence is insufficient to prove either that plaintiff was a passenger or that defendant was guilty of wilful misconduct. We have concluded that the judgment should be upheld upon the theory that plaintiff was a passenger, but not…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Oettinger v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Mercer - Fraser Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975
  2. Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Khanna v. Microdata Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  5. Pugh v. See's Candies, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API