Legal Opinion

Kruzie v. Sanders

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1943No. L. A. 18357PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment after nonsuit in an action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiffs are husband and wife, as are defendants. At the time of the accident Margaret Kruzie was riding in an automobile owned by Frank Sanders and driven with his consent by his wife, Mabel Sanders. Two questions are presented on this appeal: (1) Did plaintiff, Margaret Kruzie, accept a ride in the automobile without giving compensation therefor? (2) Was the evidence sufficient to establish the negligence of defendant, Mabel Sanders?

In stating the facts we shall, in accordance with the settled…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Martinez v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API