Legal Opinion

Druzanich v. Criley

California Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1942No. L. A. 17817PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.- —

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants after trial by the court without a jury. The action was brought against the operator and the owners of an automobile by an occupant thereof to recover damages for personal injuries. The third amended complaint contained three causes of action, the first two of which were abandoned at the trial. It was alleged in the third cause of action that plaintiff was a “passenger” in the automobile and that defendant Dorothy Griley was negligent in its operation. The" trial court found that plaintiff was not a “passenger” but was…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Ales v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Whitechat v. GuyetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Malloy v. FongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Scott v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API