Legal Opinion

Haney v. Takakura

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 5, 1934No. Civ. 5145PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant in this action were, during the times mentioned herein, neighbors residing near Orosi, in Tulare County, engaged, among other things, in the raising and marketing of oranges. The plaintiff is, and was during all of the time, a man very well informed as to general market conditions, giving considerable attention thereto, and at times making trips to the city of Oakland, where he gained further information as to market conditions.

The record shows that in the month of November, 1932, the defendant had no hand approximately 2,000 boxes of oranges, which he desired…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. O'BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ball v. RawlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Crawford v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Kruzie v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API