Reuther v. Viall
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.
In this personal injury action plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. Reuther and their two minor children by their guardian ad litem, recovered judgment on a special jury verdict finding wilful misconduct by defendant automobile driver, Mary L. Viall. Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendant a new trial, and defendant appeals from an order denying her motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 629.) Upon the evidence adduced the issue of wilful misconduct is one of fact rather than of law. There was a sufficient showing from which the jury reasonably could have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Gillespie v. RawlingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Calvillo-Silva v. Home GroceryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Smith v. Lockheed Propulsion Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967
- Callahan v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Becker v. JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.