Baxter v. Boege
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Plaintiff as assignee of the heirs of Christina E. Romer, brought a suit in equity to avoid the effect of a deed by which the defendant Chester Spencer, as administrator of the said Christina E. Romer’s estate, sought to convey certain real property of the said estate to one Emma M. Hunter. Respondents Charles A. and Louise Callow Boege and George Vandenberg are claimants to the title of Emma M. Hunter under subsequent conveyances. All of the said respondents demurred to plaintiff’s amended complaint. Their demurrers were sustained and, plaintiff declining to amend, judgment was entered…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Estate of DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Nolan v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Dennis v. BintCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Luz v. LopesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hobgood v. GlassCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.