Legal Opinion

Luz v. Lopes

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1960No. S. F. 19942PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.

— On January 4, 1956, plaintiffs Arthur Luz and Lillian Luz, his wife, entered into a written agreement with defendants Ralph Lopes and Vern Lopes, his wife, whereby defendants agreed to purchase from plaintiffs certain unimproved real property in San Jose. The purchase price was $13,000, and no down payment was made. The purchase price was to be payable in monthly installments of $100 including principal and interest at 6 per cent, with the first payment due on February 15, 1956. The agreement provided, among other things, that time was of the essence; that the buyers were to pay all taxes…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Glock v. Howard & Wilson Colony Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Collins v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Edgar M.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Carroll v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Walker v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Vibert v. BergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API