Legal Opinion

Estate of Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1907No. S.F. No. 4316PublishedCited by 47 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco distributing the estate of a deceased person. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. William T. Baggett, F. H. Gould, Horace W. Philbrook, and W. J. Bartnett, for Appellants. Campbell, Metson & Campbell, and Thomas H. Breeze, for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

Appeal from, decree of settlement of final account and final distribution.

Jacob Z. Davis died on October 28, 1896. On November 16, 1896, Lizzie Muir and Belle Curtis presented to the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco a paper purporting to be the holographic will of said Davis and filed a petition praying for its admission to probate. The document bore date October 1, 1896, and by its terms purported to give and bequeath all of Davis’s property to the petitioners, Lizzie Muir and Belle Curtis. On the filing of the petition, the clerk fixed Monday, the thirtieth day of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. McVeigh v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  4. People v. GreeneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Burris v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Loring v. Town of KingsleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Estate of KeetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Welch v. FochtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Tracy v. MuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API