Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Tinsley v. Palo Alto Unified School District

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1979No. Civ. 43478PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIMS, J. *

Petitioners, the parents of elementary school children in various elementary school districts within the territory embraced within the boundaries of Sequoia Union High School District and in Palo Alto Unified School District, seek a writ of mandate to compel the respondent elementary districts and others to submit to the court a reasonably feasible plan to eliminate or alleviate alleged racially segregated schools existing within those districts. They have appealed from a judgment entered following an order sustaining, without leave to amend, the demurrers to their second…

2Cases cited127 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hydrotech Systems, Ltd. v. Oasis WaterparkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Nguyen v. CalhounCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Salazar v. EastinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. McKinny v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API