Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco refusing to vacate a default and judgment based thereon. F. J. Murasky, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This action was one for the recovery of $6618 damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered by reason of the negligence of defendants. The complaint alleged that the “defendants, their servants, agents and employees” negligently threw from a building into a street along which plaintiff was passing “a heavy solid plank,” in such a manner that it struck plaintiff, inflicting upon him permanent and other injuries, by all of which he had been damaged “at the present time” in the sum already specified. The action was commenced in the superior court of the city and county of San…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
- Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- DKN Holdings LLC v. FaerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Zibbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Shea v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.