Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from a decree denying to defendant the relief demanded in its cross-complaint. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The complaint in this ease alleges in substance the issuance of a policy by the defendant insuring plaintiff in an amount not exceeding $2,500 against loss by fire upon certain described property, and that plaintiff had other insurance upon the same and other property, all of which insurance aggregated $127,000; that during the term of such insurance the said insured property was greatly damaged and partially destroyed by fire, and immediately after such lire plaintiff, in accordance with the terms of its policies, presented to defendant and all its other insurers, jointly, proofs of its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McAleer v. HorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Smith v. . Glen's Falls Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Safford v. GroutMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Wolfe v. PughIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.