Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Smith

California Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1902No. S.F. No. 2268PublishedCited by 36 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court..

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

The defendant Smith was a justice of the peace, and defendants Packard and Brown were sureties on his official bond. The action was brought against all three defendants to recover damages for an alleged unlawful imprisonment of plaintiff by the defendant Smith. Smith demurred to the complaint, and his demurrer was overruled, and, from all that appears, the action is still pending against him. Packard and Brown also demurred to the complaint, and their demurrer was sustained; and plaintiff, declining to amend, what purports to be a judgment for costs was entered in their favor. Prom this…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stockton Combine Harvester & Agricultural Works v. Glen's Falls Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. LockeIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. United States v. GiraultSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  4. Peck v. VandenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Bank of Rondout v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Doudell v. ShooCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Howe v. Key System Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Attorney General of Utah v. PomeroyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Nicholson v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API