Legal Opinion
Dale Arfons v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Incorporated and the Ensign-Bickford Company
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 24, 1958No. 35, Docket 24989PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.
This action, based upon alleged breaches of express and implied warranties, was brought to recover for injuries allegedly sustained by appellant when working with dynamite produced by ap-pellee duPont and fuse produced by ap-pellee Ensign-Bickford. It is contended that appellees warranted through advertisement and literature that the products were safe for the purposes for which they were sold when used according to instructions. 1 The amended complaint failed to allege the place of the original or subsequent sales of the explosive and fuse or the place of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Julius Nagler v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- McLoughlin v. ShawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- H. G. Craig & Co. v. Uncas Paperboard Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Markovich v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Muze Inc. v. Digital on Demand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. PortaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
- Brown v. BullockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- Stockwell v. Reynolds & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Cochran v. Channing CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.