Legal Opinion

Cochran v. Channing Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 15, 1962PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAWSON, District Judge.

This is a motion by defendant Chan-ning Corporation (Channing) and three of its directors named as individual defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Rule 12(b) (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Plaintiff Cochran, suing on his behalf' and on behalf of other stockholders of Agricultural Insurance Company (Agricultural), alleges two causes of action. The first is based upon a violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange-Act of 1934 and Rule* 1 Ob-5 promulgated thereunder by the Securities and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Fischman v. Raytheon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Lesnik v. Public Industrials CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  5. Strong v. RepideSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
  2. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  4. List v. Fashion Park, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  5. Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API