Legal Opinion

H. G. Craig & Co. v. Uncas Paperboard Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 9, 1926PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

From the admitted allegations of the petition and answer, constituting the facts upon which the matter was heard and determined by the trial court, it appears that the petitioner, a Pennsylvania corporation located in that State, and the Uncas Paperboard Company (hereinafter referred to as the Board Company), as the contracting parties, executed and delivered three instruments, Exhibits A, B and C, made part of the petition. These related, with the exception of one duplex cutter, to parts of a paper-making machine owned by the Board Company and located in its mill in Norwich, which parts,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In re Wilcox & Howe Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  2. Walp v. MooarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Maisch v. MaischSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1913
  4. McLoughlin v. ShawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  5. American Clay MacHinery Co. v. New England Brick Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  2. Dale Arfons v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company, Incorporated and the Ensign-Bickford CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. Thomas G. Jewett, Jr. Inc. v. Keystone Driller Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Kolb v. Golden Rule Baking Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Bickart v. SanditzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API