Legal Opinion
Brown v. Bullock
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 31, 1961PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Does the amended complaint against the eleven defendants state a claim upon which relief can be granted under the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C.A. § 80a-l et seq.?
The question is raised by motions pursuant to F.R.Civ.P., rule 12(b) (1) and (6), 28 U.S.C.A., made by the attorneys for defendants Calvin Bullock, Ltd., Hugh Bullock and Robert E. Clark, and by the attorneys for defendants Arthur F. Burns, Grayson Kirk and Frank Pace, Jr.
The motions are opposed by the plaintiffs and, to the extent that certain questions of law are involved, by the Securities and…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Burks v. LaskerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fogel v. ChestnuttCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,496 Richard J. Sargent v. Genesco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,889 Robert Abrahamson and Marjorie Abrahamson v. Malcolm K. FleschnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.