Legal Opinion
Sol A. Dann, John H. Neville and Louise A. Turek v. Studebaker-Packard Corporation, Harold E. Churchill, Hugh J. Ferry, and A. J. Porta
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 6, 1961No. 13940_1PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOYD, District Judge.
Appellants, suing on behalf of themselves as well as “on behalf of each and every other shareholder of Studebaker-Packard Corporation similarly situated,” appeal from a judgment dismissing their amended complaint without any comment by the District Judge.
The present appeal brings this case for a second time before this court, appellants previously having appealed unsuccessfully from an order of the District Court dismissing their original complaint and denying leave to amend. On February 20, 1958, this court dismissed that first appeal on the ground that the order…
2Cases cited98 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- William Harris v. Palm Springs Alpine Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,405 Joe L. Smallwood v. Pearl Brewing Company, Southdown, Inc., Zapata Norness, Inc., Albert J. Rangeand D. Doyle MizeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.