Legal Opinion
Stockwell v. Reynolds & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1965PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONSAL, District Judge.
Defendants in the above actions have moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for orders dismissing the complaints for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and have moved for other relief. Since both motions involve the same questions, they are treated together.
The plaintiffs in each action are citizens of the State of Washington. The defendants in each action are, Reynolds & Co., a New York partnership engaged in the stock brokerage business, and Ralph E. Carpenter, a citizen of the State of New York and a partner of the defendant…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Alexander Kahan, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Lewis RosenstielCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,861 Gerald Mansbach v. Prescott, Ball & TurbenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Mutual Shares Corporation, Spingarn Heine & Co., and Norte & Co. v. Genesco, Inc., and W. Maxey JarmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Crane Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.