Legal Opinion

Markovich v. McKesson & Robbins, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1958No. 24407PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, PJ.

This appeal comes to this court from a judgment for the defendant entered on the verdict of a jury as directed by the court on defendant’s motion for judgment at the conclusion of plaintiff’s presentation of her evidence. The action is based on plaintiff’s amended petition seeking damages, her first cause of action being in negligence in that defendant manufactured, sold and distributed a chemical product known as “Prom Home Permanent: which was alleged to be unfit and dangerous for human use when applied as directed, and in her second cause of action claiming damages by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kellogg Bridge Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Sicard v. Distributing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rogers v. Toni Home Permanent Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Phipps v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API