Legal Opinion
Bastjan v. Bastjan
California Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 11309PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
In this cause the opinion of Mr. Justice Sturtevant, heretofore rendered by the honorable District Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District, Division Two, is hereby adopted as a portion of the opinion of this court herein as follows, to wit:
“By their pleadings each party asked for a divorce and a division of properties. Each spouse accused the other of cruelty. The plaintiff set forth all properties held by both parties claiming to own a half interest in each. The defendant set forth all properties making the same claim except that he claimed as separate property a tract located at…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bates v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Duryea v. BurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Koyer v. WillmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,935 Vance L. Ragsdale v. John Frederick Haller AKA Fred HallerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Swarthout v. GentryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mazzera v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Cochran v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.