Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Hogan

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1909No. Docket Nos. 15, 16PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeals from Marquette; Stone, J. Bills by Charles Johnson and the Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company against Philip J. Hogan and others, and by the Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company against Louise T. Hull and others, to quiet title to land. From decrees for defendants, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBrooke, J.

The foregoing are companion cases; the determination in either being controlling of the other. We will consider the first of the two cases.

The amended and supplemental bill of complaint avers: That the complainant, the Cleveland-Cliffs Iron Company, is the owner in fee simple of lots 7, 8, and 9 of section 36, township 45 north, range 25 west, Marquette county, Mich., and is in constructive possession of said premises, and no one is in actual possession thereof. That it had on. November 25, 1905, acquired title thereto by a proper deed from complainant Charles Johnson and his wife, Louise…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Moran v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Tidd v. RinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  4. Morrison v. MendenhallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  5. Hammond v. PaxtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Logan v. LoganTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Vlamis v. De WeeseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Adams v. BlumenshineNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Stone v. CulverMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API