Legal Opinion

City of Stockton v. Ellingwood

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 13, 1929No. Docket No. 3408PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

The transcript in the above-entitled cause includes the record on appeal of nineteen actions consolidated for the purposes of trial. Five of these actions have been dismissed, leaving for oup present consideration the appeals in fourteen of said actions. For the purposes of convenience the defendants and respondents will hereafter be referred to as defendants and respondents, without naming the particular defendant or respondent, only in cases where necessity requires.

The actions are all eminent domain proceedings, instituted by the City of Stockton to acquire certain lands and premises to be…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. McGovern v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. Ocean Shore Railroad, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1948
  3. City of Los Angeles v. DeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. MossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API