Cooley v. Miller & Lux, Inc.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action for the partition of real property. The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The claim of the plaintiff to an interest in the land is founded upon an instrument, designated in the record as “Exhibit B,” purporting to be a conveyance from certain legatees and devisees under the will of Charles Lux, who died on March 15, 1887. These persons are referred to in the record as the “German heirs.” They were represented in California by one of their number, Henry Lux, who was the attorney in fact for the others and as such executed for them the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Cooley v. Miller & LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Martinovich v. MarsicanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Robertson v. BurrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Cunha v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Minifie v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Metropolis Tr. & Sav. Bank v. MonnierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Perelli-Minetti v. LawsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- State Bank of Wheatland v. Bagley Bros.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.