Legal Opinion
Grier v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 25, 1930No. 19161PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, C.
In this action Lorenzo Grier seeks to enjoin the city of Tulsa from collecting paving assessments' assessed against his property for paving Eighth street in said city from Madison avenue to Norfolk avenue. It is alleged that said assessment is illegal for want of jurisdiction in said city to levy the same. A demurrer to plaintiff’s petition was sustained and judgment entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
It appears that plaintiff is the owner of lots 1, 2, 7, and 8 in block 3, Oakland addition to the city of Tuisa. Said block is irregularly shaped, being bounded on the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Flanagan v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- City of Tulsa v. McCormickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
3Cited by7 opinions
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Rupp v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Ambrister v. City of NormanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Wright v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Seibold v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.