Legal Opinion

Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1925No. 12681PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county by the Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Company to enjoin the city of Tulsa from collecting certain paving assessments alleged to have been illegally levied against.the railway company’s property, the property in question being a portion of the railroad right of w ay, the assessment being the railway' company’s proportional liability for the cost of paving a street upon which the city claimed the railroad property abutted. The railway company contends that a portion of the property assessed does not abut upon said street, and is therefore not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  4. City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. North Side State Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  2. Wilson v. HarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  4. City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  5. Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API