Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This action was begun in the district court of Tulsa county by the Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Company to enjoin the city of Tulsa from collecting certain paving assessments alleged to have been illegally levied against.the railway company’s property, the property in question being a portion of the railroad right of w ay, the assessment being the railway' company’s proportional liability for the cost of paving a street upon which the city claimed the railroad property abutted. The railway company contends that a portion of the property assessed does not abut upon said street, and is therefore not…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- French v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Paulsen v. PortlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- North Side State Bank v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Wilson v. HarlowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Grand River Dam Authority v. Grand-HydroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.