Legal Opinion
Ambrister v. City of Norman
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1959No. 38442PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WELCH, Justice.
This action was commenced by the plaintiffs for injunction to enjoin defendant from proceeding in connection with a street improvement district, -which consists of a portion of Main Street of said defendant city, the same being a continuation of State Highway No. 9. The petition for injunction was denied by the trial court, and plaintiffs perfect this appeal.
It is first argued by plaintiffs that the City has no jurisdiction to create a paving district on a part of the State Highway System without agreement with the State Highway Commission. Sections 49 and 50 of Title 69, and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Wichita Falls v. Bowen, TrusteeTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Town of Refugio v. StrauchTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Harrington v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Terry v. EdginSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Moore Funeral Homes, Inc. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- City of Raleigh v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- City of Muskogee v. BorumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.