Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. McCormick

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 24, 1917No. 8487PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; Conn Linn, Judge. Action by F. P- McCormick against the City of Tulsa, J. H. Simmons, Mayor, A. L. Funk, and others, members of its board of commissioners. Judgment for plaintiff directing the passage of an assessment ordinance, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.

The city of Tulsa, operating under a charter form of government, contracted with F. P. McCormick to construct certain paving upon certain streets and avenues within the city, which work has been performed according to contract and accepted by the city. After the completion and acceptance of the work, McCormick requested the board of commissioners to pass an assessment ordinance and to issue to him tax bills pursuant thereto. In response to this request, the board of commissioners adopted a resolution in which it was recited that the contract had been completed and the work accepted, and that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gast Realty & Investment Co. v. Schneider Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Bowlus v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  4. Flanagan v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Fraser v. OttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. City of Lawton v. AkersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Grier v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Hemsley v. SageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  5. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API